Giant Hail Storm Prediction Getting Better
Barrages of ice can cause billions of dollars in damage, but the storms have been difficult to predict.
Back in July 1990, Boulder, Colo., and surrounding communities were hit by one of the most freakish weather disasters on record. A severe summer storm pelted the area with hailstones, balls of ice that in some cases, were big as baseballs.
According to a local TV station's account, thousands of homes sustained major damage to roofs and windows, and some automobiles were so badly battered that they were a total loss. The frozen barrage stripped paint from street signs and ripped foliage off trees. At an amusement park, 47 people were injured when they were caught on a roller coaster during the sudden storm. All in all, the area suffered about $1 billion in losses from the hail.
Monster hail storms like that don't happen very often, fortunately. But when they do, it can be pretty scary. Unfortunately, while scientists know basically that storms with a rotating updraft on their southwestern sides tend to produce both the biggest, most severe tornadoes and a lot of large hail, there's still a lot that they don't know about how such storms form and how to predict the worst ones in advance.
That's why a team of University of Oklahoma researchers, with support from the National Science Foundation grant, working on using a supercomputer to develop a better understanding of severe hail storms.
The ominously-named Severe Hail Analysis, Representation and Prediction project, AKA SHARP, utilizes the Stampede supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas at Austin to perform experimental weather forecasts.
To predict hailstorms and other weather, scientists have used math and physics to develop models that represent the storms on a grid consisting of millions of points. The finer the resolution of the grid, the more accurate the forecast. The SHARP team is using a grid point for every 500 meters - six times the resolution of the models currently used by the National Weather Service.
That, in turn, allows the scientists to predict the behavior of storms more accurately. In a simulation of a massive tornado that hit Oklahoma in 2013, they produced mock forecasts that described the storm's impact better than actual NWS forecasts from that time.
"This has the potential to change the way people look at severe weather predictions," explained research scientist Nathan Snook in a press release. "Five or 10 years down the road, when we have a system that can tell you that there's a severe hail storm coming hours in advance, and to be able to trust that - it will change how we see severe weather. Instead of running for shelter, you'll know there's a storm coming and can schedule your afternoon."
Monster hail storms don’t happen very often, but when they do, they can be destructive.
The winners are in from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's "Weather in Focus" photo contest, picked from more than 2,000 entries taken between Jan. 1, 2014 and March 31, 2015. "From rainbows and sunsets to lightning and tornadoes, the winning photos aren’t just captivating to look at, but inspire us to look at the world in different ways," said Douglas Hilderbrand, NOAA's contest judge and Weather-Ready Nation Ambassador Lead. "It was difficult to pick winners from so many good entries." In first place, from the category "Science in Action," is "Green Bank Telescope in WV" by Mike Zorger, Falls Church, Va.
All 16 winning images will be displayed in a
exhibit located on the NOAA campus in Silver Spring, Md., starting in July. Second place in "Science in Action" went to "Photographer captures the aurora" by Christopher Morse, Fairbanks, Alaska.
In third place: "Atmospheric Research Observatory" by Joseph Phillips, Boulder, Colo.
And honorable mention also went to Joseph Phillips, Boulder, Colo. for "Atmospheric Research Observatory."
In the category "Weather, Water & Climate," first place went to "Snow Express" by Conrad Stenftenagel, Saint Anthony, Ind.
In second place was "Proton arc over Lake Superior" by Ken William, Clio, Mich.
"With a Bang" by Bob Larson, Prescott, Ariz., won third place in the "Weather, Water & Climate" category.
Honorable mention went to Alana Peterson, Maple Lake, Minn. for "Raindrops on a Leaf."
A second honorable mention was won for "Fire in the Sky over Glacier National Park" by Sashikanth Chintla, North Brunswick, N.J.
In the category "In the Moment," first place went to "Smoky Mountains" by Elijah Burris, Canton, N.C.
Second place went to "Spring Captured: Freezing rain attempts to halt spring" by Mike Shelby, Elkridge, Md.
And third place went to "Rolling clouds in Lake Tahoe" by Christopher LeBoa, San Leandro, Calif.
Of course the professionals had their own category. First place was won by Brad Goddard, Orion, Ill., for "Stars behind the storm."
Brad Goddard pretty much cleaned up this category, winning second (and third) place with "A tornado churns up dust in sunset light near Traer, IA."
Third place went for "A tornado crosses the path, Reinbeck, IA" by Brad Goddard.
“Fog rolls in from the ocean on a hot summer day, Belbar, N.J.” by Robert Raia, Toms River, N.J., won honorable mention in the pro category.